These GrouplyFans yakking it up in the GrouplyImprovements group think that we have no right to “interfere” in Grouply’s business. Well, Grouply is going to find out that as word continues getting out about what they are doing, there will be many more moderators blocking them and banning their users. This is just the beginning. Many people never heard of Grouply. None of my co-moderators did until I told them about it. None of my freecycling group members heard of it until I told them not to use it or they will be removed from the group. As more people find out what it is (a scheme to make money off our private message traffic), many will not participate, and will tell their friends and groups to stay out of it.
Some of these GrouplyFans are not defending Grouply because they truly believe in the product. I see many of them posting messages to groups every day without using Grouply to do it! If they like Grouply so much, why aren’t they using it?
Some of them just see dollar signs. They think that Grouply is going to be the “next big thing,” and they want to get in on the ground floor buying shares when Grouply issues an IPO (becomes a publicly traded company), if they survive that long. I have seen three of the leading GrouplyFans say things like this. They think they are going to be the next Google or Microsoft first shareholders. Nonsense. Grouply does not stand a chance of ever becoming big, because there is no need for their product. They will be lucky to get 2% of Yahoo and Google Group users to subscribe, especially with the bad publicity they have caused for themselves.
They’ll get lots of spammers and miscreants to join, because it’s a great tool for spamming and spying on group members. Stalkers and pedophiles will just love it. That will just generate more bad publicity for them.
It is not “good business” to barge in and demand that people surrender their private data so some stranger can use it to generate advertising revenue by mining their data to target advertising dollars. Grouply has only ONE goal: making money. Their propaganda about “improving your experience of Yahoo! Groups” is nonsense. If that was their goal, they would include support of all features of Y! Groups, not just aggregation and mining of the message archives.
They don’t care what we think, but they will find out that many good people believe there is more to life than making money, and they don’t believe (as Shal and Srihari and TexasCritter other GrouplyFans do) that Grouply has some “right” to make money on our message traffic.
Grouply shot themselves in the foot when they gave spamming tools to their subscribers. All it did was raise alarm bells, not generate good publicity for them. I see it as conspiracy to violate the U.S. CAN SPAM Act of 2003, and the Federal Trade Commission needs to receive lots of complaints about it to get them to act on it. We need to flood the FTC with email and postal mail about it.
Yahoo management and the public and the Federal Trade Commission are the people we need to be talking to, not groups run by GrouplyFans who suppress opposition to Grouply.
We need to stick to the fundamental principles involved:
(1) It is dangerous and foolish to give up your password to a stranger.
(2) Nobody has a “right” to take our private group message traffic and make money by generating advertising revenue with it.
(3) Yahoo should provide group owners with the ability to block third party “aggregators” from this kind of activity, and to block external domain names from accessing our group content.
(4) The Yahoo! TOS prohibits transmitting group content to another web site.
I think it’s time for Yahoo to give us firewall-style tools to prevent access to our groups by DOMAIN NAME. In other words, the ability to block any outside web site from accessing our group site, or any email address with a given domain name from joining. Hotmail allows its users to block not just email addresses, but entire domains. In my hotmail account, I can block @grouply.com, not just individual email addresses. Yahoo should allow us to do that, too. But blocking email addresses with a given domain name is not enough. We need a firewall-style blocking that prevents external web sites from directly accessing our message archives via web connection (not just harvesting via Individual Emails member settings), even if they do have a member’s password to do it.
But I note with interest that people are not flocking in droves to sign up for Grouply, either. Less than one percent of the EL-M group are Grouply subscribers. Only about a dozen of the GrouplyImprovements members are Grouply subscribers, and at least two of them are Grouply staff, and two of them are GrouplyFan moderators. Grouply hardly has any serious beta testers (which is why they have so many bugs and problems), and very few fans.
It’s a pretty lame product anyway. I explored it pretty seriously, and found nothing about it that “improved my experience of Yahoo Groups.”
Grouply may end up just dying of natural causes and self-inflicted wounds. I hope so.